<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bourbondesh</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/</link>
	<description>Revolution!</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 14:09:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: F.A. Hayek</title>
		<link>http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/comment-page-1/#comment-16040</link>
		<dc:creator>F.A. Hayek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2005 05:41:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/wordpress/archives/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/#comment-16040</guid>
		<description>&quot;. . . tied into the libertarian philosophy, as I’ve seen it exercised on the street, 
is a contempt for government—such that when such contemptuous people get in government, 
they act with indifference and people die.&quot;

Mr. M,

Your street observations have not given you an accurate portrait of what Libertarianism
is. Try reading my book, &quot;Road to Serfdom.&quot; Just a friendly suggestion.

Yours,

F.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;. . . tied into the libertarian philosophy, as I’ve seen it exercised on the street,<br />
is a contempt for government—such that when such contemptuous people get in government,<br />
they act with indifference and people die.&#8221;</p>
<p>Mr. M,</p>
<p>Your street observations have not given you an accurate portrait of what Libertarianism<br />
is. Try reading my book, &#8220;Road to Serfdom.&#8221; Just a friendly suggestion.</p>
<p>Yours,</p>
<p>F.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: m</title>
		<link>http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/comment-page-1/#comment-16036</link>
		<dc:creator>m</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 17:05:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/wordpress/archives/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/#comment-16036</guid>
		<description>Friedrich, I&#039;m fing on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/wordpress/archives/2005/09/05/mini-hiatus/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;mini-hiatus&lt;/a&gt;.

Smaller was meant relatively in my comparison to B&#039;desh. Smaller in terms of resources, and not, perhaps, on ideological grounds.

Your points about a bloated government miss the point: tied into the libertarian philosophy, as I&#039;ve seen it exercised on the street, is a contempt for government---such that when such contemptuous people get &lt;i&gt;in&lt;/i&gt; government, they act with indifference and people die. That&#039;s the point.

Furthermore, despite the bloat, FEMA has been shrunken. It was folded into dhs. The most telling example of the &quot;shrunken&quot; gov&#039;t is when Bush is tending to those two young black women and he tells them not to worry; there&#039;s a Salvation Army truck around. Salvation Army? not part of the gov&#039;t. Just sayin&#039;...

The Feds outsourced disaster relief. That&#039;s what I mean. If that means it&#039;s bigger or smaller, I don&#039;t know. That&#039;s from where the free market business comes, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Friedrich, I&#8217;m fing on <a href="http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/wordpress/archives/2005/09/05/mini-hiatus/" rel="nofollow">mini-hiatus</a>.</p>
<p>Smaller was meant relatively in my comparison to B&#8217;desh. Smaller in terms of resources, and not, perhaps, on ideological grounds.</p>
<p>Your points about a bloated government miss the point: tied into the libertarian philosophy, as I&#8217;ve seen it exercised on the street, is a contempt for government&#8212;such that when such contemptuous people get <i>in</i> government, they act with indifference and people die. That&#8217;s the point.</p>
<p>Furthermore, despite the bloat, FEMA has been shrunken. It was folded into dhs. The most telling example of the &#8220;shrunken&#8221; gov&#8217;t is when Bush is tending to those two young black women and he tells them not to worry; there&#8217;s a Salvation Army truck around. Salvation Army? not part of the gov&#8217;t. Just sayin&#8217;&#8230;</p>
<p>The Feds outsourced disaster relief. That&#8217;s what I mean. If that means it&#8217;s bigger or smaller, I don&#8217;t know. That&#8217;s from where the free market business comes, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: F.A. Hayek</title>
		<link>http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/comment-page-1/#comment-16034</link>
		<dc:creator>F.A. Hayek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2005 07:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/wordpress/archives/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/#comment-16034</guid>
		<description>&quot;It’s just a small government of poor Bangladeshis trying to cope with the fact that they live in a really dangerous part of the world.&quot;

After sharing an anecdote about a much smaller government that at 
least at the moment seems much more effective in dealing with floods
(in part, surely, because floods are more common there), you conclude
that the problem has been &#039;libertarian&#039; republicans shrinking 
government. How does this make any sense at all? Has it occured to you
that the problem hasn&#039;t been funding but rather bureaucracy? Have
you noticed that there is nothing libertarian at all about the current
Republican administration--that they&#039;re increasing the size of gov&#039;t 
much faster than, say, Clinton did.  Also, FEMA has nothing to do 
with the free market. It is still a federal program. The problem may
well have been Bush folding the program into Homeland Security (read:
a bigger bureaucratic morass) and making it subsequently less 
effective. Again, the problem doesn&#039;t seem to be funding but rather
thick layers of bureaucracy. Why would you want to throw money at 
this? Katrina may be (in a small way) an indictment of the very 
philosophy that guides the current GOP administration, but you 
completely misunderstand what that philosophy is. It isn&#039;t small
gov&#039;t, Goldwater conservatism, that&#039;s for sure. It&#039;s really the 
mirror image of big government progressives with a different social
agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It’s just a small government of poor Bangladeshis trying to cope with the fact that they live in a really dangerous part of the world.&#8221;</p>
<p>After sharing an anecdote about a much smaller government that at<br />
least at the moment seems much more effective in dealing with floods<br />
(in part, surely, because floods are more common there), you conclude<br />
that the problem has been &#8216;libertarian&#8217; republicans shrinking<br />
government. How does this make any sense at all? Has it occured to you<br />
that the problem hasn&#8217;t been funding but rather bureaucracy? Have<br />
you noticed that there is nothing libertarian at all about the current<br />
Republican administration&#8211;that they&#8217;re increasing the size of gov&#8217;t<br />
much faster than, say, Clinton did.  Also, FEMA has nothing to do<br />
with the free market. It is still a federal program. The problem may<br />
well have been Bush folding the program into Homeland Security (read:<br />
a bigger bureaucratic morass) and making it subsequently less<br />
effective. Again, the problem doesn&#8217;t seem to be funding but rather<br />
thick layers of bureaucracy. Why would you want to throw money at<br />
this? Katrina may be (in a small way) an indictment of the very<br />
philosophy that guides the current GOP administration, but you<br />
completely misunderstand what that philosophy is. It isn&#8217;t small<br />
gov&#8217;t, Goldwater conservatism, that&#8217;s for sure. It&#8217;s really the<br />
mirror image of big government progressives with a different social<br />
agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/comment-page-1/#comment-15995</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2005 00:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.1984produkts.com/donkeyhottie/wordpress/archives/2005/09/02/bourbondesh/#comment-15995</guid>
		<description>I agree. This is just shameful. We&#039;ve spent countless dollars on improving &quot;homeland security&quot; over the past four years--presumably so we would be ready for domestic disasters--and the feds are now just barely starting to intervene. Five days.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-050902daley,1,2011979.story?coll=chi-news-hed&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This&lt;/a&gt; also made me really mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This is just shameful. We&#8217;ve spent countless dollars on improving &#8220;homeland security&#8221; over the past four years&#8211;presumably so we would be ready for domestic disasters&#8211;and the feds are now just barely starting to intervene. Five days.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/local/chi-050902daley,1,2011979.story?coll=chi-news-hed" rel="nofollow">This</a> also made me really mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
